While everyone assumes (and wants) Glasgow to be let go, I'd keep him, not as a starter, but as a valuable backup that can play all three interior positions
While everything should be weighed through the emotional toll of the season, he was pretty beat up and I didn't get the sense he had much interest in continuing his career after this season. Again, mindset changes when you get away from it for a few months, but that was my read in December.
I don't think it was a restructure he refused. He refused a pay cut. At least that's what I recall. I suspect giwan was referring to restructuring other other players not GG. There are no years left on his contract so the only way to restructure Glasgow's contract would be by adding void years.
While everyone assumes (and wants) Glasgow to be let go, I'd keep him, not as a starter, but as a valuable backup that can play all three interior positions
I'd rather keep a younger depth piece, like Sorsdal perhaps. Someone who is getting better and not declining. Glasgow had a good run.
I would not assume that
While everything should be weighed through the emotional toll of the season, he was pretty beat up and I didn't get the sense he had much interest in continuing his career after this season. Again, mindset changes when you get away from it for a few months, but that was my read in December.
Problem is you can’t keep him and have the money to sign the starter that he would be backing up.
They need to restructure which they will and have plenty of funds. GG seems like an excellent backup, short term fills at R or L guard and center
Yes you can always create cap room, but you don’t create cap room to give 9MM for the season to a backup.
He refused a restructure last year, I doubt he would be more inclined to do one this year.
I don't think it was a restructure he refused. He refused a pay cut. At least that's what I recall. I suspect giwan was referring to restructuring other other players not GG. There are no years left on his contract so the only way to restructure Glasgow's contract would be by adding void years.
Possibly so. I'm not sure we know that for sure but yeah.